ABSTRACT
Negligence is the breach of a duty caused by the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided by those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do. The definition involves three constituents of negligence: (1) A legal duty to exercise due care on the part of the party complained of towards the party complaining the former's conduct within the scope of the duty; (2) breach of the said duty; and (3) consequential damage. Cause of action for negligence arises only when damage occurs; for, damage is a necessary ingredient of this tort. Hon’ble Supreme Court Bench comprising B.N. Agrawal, P.P. Naolekar & Dalveer Bhandari, pronounced a Judgment on May 8, 2007 on this issue. Other relevant decisions of various Consumer Forums including National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission are discussed. This paper will help in enlightening medical fraternity on new dimensions of scope of COPRA 1986, meaning and interpretations of term ‘service’ ‘consumer’ and ‘jurisdiction’.
Subject(s)
Consumer Advocacy/legislation & jurisprudence , Duty to Warn , Facility Regulation and Control/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , India , Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Safety/legislation & jurisprudenceABSTRACT
Este estudo objetiva analisar a situação dos estádiosde futebol profissional de Pelotas, tendo como referênciao Estatuto de Defesa do Torcedor (EDT), com atençãoespecial para as condições de higiene, segurança, ingressose transporte. Como metodologia, além da análisedocumental do EDT realizamos visitas aos estádios em trêsmomentos com registros fotográficos e entrevistamos umdirigente de cada clube: Grêmio Esportivo Brasil, EsporteClube Pelotas e Grêmio Atlético Farroupilha. Constatamosque a atenção dedicada pela mídia e pelos órgãosfiscalizadores à implementação do EDT está sendo menordo que ocorreu no momento da sua publicação.
This study has as objective analyses thesituation of the stadiums of professional soccer ofPelotas, using as reference the Spectators Statuteof Defense (SSD), with special attention to theconditions of hygiene, safety, entrances andtransport. As methodology, besides documentalanalysis of the SSD we realized visits to thestadiums in three moments where we tookphotographic registrations, as well as interviewswith one manager of each club: Grêmio EsportivoBrasil, Esporte Clube Pelotas e Grêmio AtléticoFarroupilha. We verified that the attention dedicatedfor press communication and controllers organs toimplementation of SSD is being less than occurs atthe moment of your publication.
Este estudo objetiva analisar lasituación de los estadios de fútbol de la ciudad dePelotas, tomando como referencia el Estatuto deDefensa del Hincha (EDH), con atención especialpara las condiciones de higiene, seguridad, ingresoy transporte. Como metodología, además delanalisis documental del EDH realisamos visitas alos estadios en tres momentos con registrosfotográticos y entrevistamos un dirigente de cadaclub: Gremio Desportivo Brasil, Esporte ClubPelotas y Gremio Atlético Farroupilha. Constatamosque la atención dedicada en la media y por losorganos fiscalizadores a la implementación delEDH es menor de la que ocurrió en el momento dela publicación.